Copyright suit against Apple, Shyamalan can proceed

A federal appeals court Wednesday reinstated copyright litigation against Apple Inc. and well-known director M. Night Shyamalan in a case involving two productions, each of which featured a grieving mother who hired a babysitter to take care of what turned out to be a doll.

Francesca Gregorini, who had written, directed and produced 2013’s “The Truth About Emanuel,” had sued Apple, Mr. Shyamalan and others in connection with its Apple+ television series “Servant,” charging copyright infringement, according to Tuesday’s ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco in Francesca Gregorini v. Apple, Inc. et al. Mr. Shyamalan is an executive producer of “Servant.”

The complaint, which was filed in U.S. District Court in Pasadena, California, in January 2020, said “Emanuel” was about an 18-year-old girl hired as a babysitter to take care of a bogus baby.

“Shockingly, this plot description of Emanuel could just as easily be applied to Servant, made six years later,” the complaint states. “These similarities include not just parallel plot points, but also strikingly similar — and highly idiosyncratic – characters, scenes, directorial choices and modes of storytelling. … Plaintiff easily describes more than sufficient similarity to establish copyright infringement.”

In their motion to dismiss the complaint, the defendants said that while both the film and television series “employ aspects of … unprotectable concepts,” including a grieving mother, in Emanuel there is “a quintessential American teenager struggling to cope with the loss of her mother” while “Servant” involves “a deeply religious self-flagellating young woman” who leaves her cult “and seemingly transforms a doll into a real baby.”

The three-judge appeals court panel ruled the District Court’s dismissal of the case at the pleading stage was improper.

“In particular, expert testimony would aid the court in objectively evaluating similarities in cinematic techniques, distinguishing creative elements from scènes à faire, determining the extent and qualitative importance of similar elements between the works, and comparing works in the different mediums of film and television.”

Attorneys in the case did not respond to requests for comment.

This website states: The content on this site is sourced from the internet. If there is any infringement, please contact us and we will handle it promptly.